Saturday, February 7, 2026

The Bloom Is Off the Rose – January 2026 M&A Activity


Label Converters Enter a More Sober Phase

For much of the past decade and a half, discussions about mergers and acquisitions in the printing and packaging industries have been dominated by the steady drumbeat of label-printing deals, as often reported here in The Target Report. (See The Target Report: Duking it Out in the Label Business – February 2023). However, over the past several months, transactional activity in the label segment has slowed, and there have been rumblings that the overall label printing and converting businesses face increasing headwinds.

Those rumblings turned unmistakably loud on January 29th, when Multi-Color Corporation (“MCC”) filed for Chapter 11 protection under a prepackaged restructuring plan designed to slash its debt load, eliminate existing equity, and fundamentally reset its capital structure. Supported in advance (hence the “prepack”) by the majority of its senior lenders and its private equity sponsor, CD&R, the filing allows MCC to continue operating without disruption.

MCC’s importance to the industry and the impact of the bankruptcy filing cannot be overstated. As of the bankruptcy filing, the company operated in 25 countries, with over 90 facilities, of which 39 are in North America. The company employs 12,800 people worldwide, with 4,870 of those working here in the US. The parent company has 85 wholly owned subsidiaries and 56 related debtor entities that filed for bankruptcy concurrently with MCC.

The MCC bankruptcy filing is the clearest signal yet that the consolidation in the label printing and converting sector has entered a more mature, and far less forgiving, phase. For many in the label business, including other PE-backed label platform companies, a top contender in the contest for a high-multiple exit from ownership has been taken off the field, at least for the foreseeable future.


A History of Innovation

MCC traces its roots to 1916, when it was founded in Cincinnati as the Franklin Development Company. The founders were impressed by the latest innovations in printing technology, especially the new mechanized presses that enabled the three-color printing process (black was just being introduced as the fourth color at the time). As a consequence of their interest in the new machines, their initial business venture was to incorporate The Printing Machinery Company as a subsidiary. They quickly decided that the business of operating the presses, rather than competing with established press manufacturers, was a better option, and changed the name to Multicolor Type.

By 1918, the company was producing color paper labels. From the beginning, the company focused on big national brands that required consistent color and predictable quality. Early references to the company’s customers in the 1920’s include stalwart names such as Coca-Cola, Colgate-Palmolive, Procter & Gamble, Campbell Soup, and Wrigley chewing gum.

From the humble beginnings in three-color printing, the company steadily evolved its technological prowess, investing heavily in rotogravure printing during the 1950s. Most notably, MCC played the instrumental role in the development of in-mold label technology, which was introduced to the market in 1980.

A Roll-Up of Roll-Ups

The current incarnation of MCC is the product of a steady drumbeat of acquisitions spanning nearly four decades. In 1985, the company acquired Georgia-Pacific's label-printing divisions, followed by an initial public offering two years later. The company focused on building its unique advantage in the in-mold label business, a limited market, while suffering declines in the much larger market for traditional labels. A substantial decline in business occurred when cigarette manufacturers brought packaging printing in-house, amidst the decline in smoking in the US. What followed for MCC was a precursor of today’s challenges as the company limped through the 1990s. There were years in which the company, which was public at the time, reported significant losses.

Beginning in late 1999, the company changed course and began an aggressive campaign of acquisitions and mergers to expand its market position and product offerings. With the acquisition of France-based Buriot International, MCC entered the market for pressure-sensitive labels, which was experiencing significant growth, driven by technological advancements in flexographic printing. Shortly thereafter, MCC acquired Uniflex Corporation, adding heat-shrink labels and tamper-evident bands to its product lineup.

In October 2011, just one month after the launch of The Target Report, MCC made its first appearance in this column and has appeared regularly in our deal logs and commentary ever since. In July 2017, the nature of the transactions changed dramatically in size and impact when MCC acquired the label division of Vienna, Austria-based Constantia Flexibles, itself the product of a concerted roll-up strategy. A year and a half later, Platinum Equity entered the picture and announced that it was taking MCC private in a transaction valued at $2.5 billion, ending MCC’s 32 years as a public company (See The Target Report: Platinum Equity Likes Print – February 2019). The transaction included the assumption of $1.5 billion of debt. When the deal closed later that year, Platinum Equity simultaneously merged MCC with WS Packaging, which it had acquired in 2018.

In July 2021, private equity firm Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (“CD&R”) hit a double, acquiring MCC from Platinum Equity simultaneously with the acquisition of PE-backed Fort Dearborn, one of MCC’s major competitors and itself the result of serial acquisitions (See The Target Report: Packaging Industry Consolidation in Every Direction – July 2021). While the terms of the CD&R transaction were not disclosed, it is a safe assumption that the multiple, layered transactions involved significant debt placed on the combined, and now truly global, organization. According to documents filed with the Bankruptcy Court, as of the filing date, the company’s aggregate outstanding principal amount of prepetition debt obligations stood at $5.9 billion.

The Prepack

In its bankruptcy filing, MCC’s Chief Restructuring Officer outlines a familiar but unforgiving sequence of events. Demand for labels surged as business activity resumed following the Covid shutdowns, colliding with material shortages, labor constraints, and rising input costs. Like many printing and packaging companies, MCC was slow to fully reprice its work to reflect this new cost structure. By prioritizing key customers and managing constrained capacity, the company ceded market share in parts of its business as conditions began to normalize.

The post-Covid demand surge proved temporary. As customers worked through excess inventories, volumes declined more sharply than expected, leaving MCC with a cost structure and capital burden built for a higher level of activity. Policy uncertainty surrounding tariffs further complicated planning and execution, particularly given the company’s global manufacturing footprint. These external pressures were compounded by internal integration challenges, including the absorption of the Fort Dearborn acquisition and subsequent add-on transactions, which proved more difficult and time-consuming than anticipated.

The financial impact was material. Revenue declined from $3.56 billion in 2022 to $3.06 billion in 2025, a decrease of 14%. Over the same period, EBITDA fell from $598 million to $409 million, compressing margins from 16.8% to 13.4%, a meaningful erosion for a business built on scale and predictability. With leverage amplifying the effects of softer demand and operational disruption, MCC elected last month not to make a $36.2 million interest payment, choosing to preserve liquidity and maintain uninterrupted operations.

The prepackaged restructuring plan submitted to the Court is designed to reduce net debt by approximately $3.9 billion, provide more than $550 million in liquidity at closing, lower annual debt service obligations by roughly $350 million, and extend maturities by seven years. Of critical importance to the company’s ongoing operations, and in contrast to many bankruptcies, general unsecured trade creditors will be paid in full, ensuring continuity of supply across MCC’s global manufacturing base.

The existing equity interests held by CD&R will be eliminated under the plan, though the sponsor has committed $889 million of new capital to support the restructuring, including $400 million in newly issued common equity. In practical terms, while the capital structure will be fundamentally reset, CD&R is likely to retain significant influence over the reorganized company, subject to final court approval.

From Growth Darling to Normalized Sector

To be clear, labels are not facing a collapse in demand. End markets remain intact, and the category retains many of the advantages that made it attractive for investment in the first place, including recurring revenue and consolidation opportunities. What we believe has changed is the market’s willingness to treat those advantages as justification for sky-high multiples supported by bleeding-edge leverage.

MCC’s bankruptcy filing, therefore, carries significance well beyond the failure of its own capital structure to survive a softening in the market. It challenges the idea that labels were somehow insulated from the forces now reshaping packaging markets more broadly. Rising interest rates and higher debt-servicing costs, softening consumer demand, and the limits of debt-fueled, acquisition-driven growth have converged, presumably sending a message to owners of all label-printing and converting businesses.

Implications for Independent Owners

For independent label converters, the current moment carries practical implications: sellers’ valuation expectations need to reset.

Many owners likely remain mentally and emotionally anchored to peak-cycle transactions from 2021 and 2022, when competitive auctions and cheap debt pushed label segment enterprise value multiples to historic highs. Owners of label printing companies seeking to sell over the past several years could look to several PE-backed platforms and be confident that buyers would line up to acquire their companies (See The Target Report: Private Equity Fuel$ Consolidation of Label Industry – September 2021).

Today’s buyers are benchmarking against a very different risk environment. Sellers who wait for yesterday’s market to return may face a long, potentially unrequited wait for the hot label-company market to reappear. The takeaway is that the exuberance has cooled, and sellers should expect a rigorous, rational process from buyers. Owners considering a transaction should expect more detailed operational reviews and more conservative deal structures. Expect earnouts, rollover equity, and other risk-mitigation deal structures as buyers seek to share risk and build resilience into their roll-ups.

MCC’s restructuring marks a symbolic turning point. It does not invalidate the label sector’s fundamental strengths, but it does underscore the limits of leverage, consolidation, and optimism when fundamentals soften. For owners of independent label printers, the message is not to panic, but rather to adjust expectations.

   
2026 January - Mergers and Acquisitions in the Printing, Packaging, Paper & Related Industries

Deal Party #1
(Surviving Entity)
Pre-Deal
Revenue
(US$Mil)


Party #1 Address


Deal Party #2
Pre-Deal
Revenue
(US$Mil)


Party #2 Address
Date
Deal
Public
Deal
Value
(US$Mil)

Deal Structure
(Intermediary)


Notes

Press
Links
Crown Paper Group
(Port co. Atlas Holdings)
No Data Port Townsend, WA Richmond, BC Packaging Plant
(Div. Cascades)
$4,790 Kingsey Falls, QC 1/29/26 No Data Acquisition Corrugated packaging Link
International Paper $23,630 Memphis, TN EMEA Packaging $8,500 TBD 1/29/26 No Data Spinoff Paper & paperboard mills Link
Lexington Area Chamber of Commerce No Data Lexington, MO The Lexington News (+2 Titles)
(Prop. Main Street Media)
No Data Lexington, MO 1/28/26 No Data Acquisition
(Dirks, Van Essen)
Community newspapers Link
CherryRoad Media No Data Parsippany, NJ The Carrollton Democrat
(Prop. Main Street Media)
No Data Carrollton, MO 1/28/26 No Data Acquisition
(Dirks, Van Essen)
Community newspaper Link
Allegra (Carol Stream) No Data Carol Stream, IL Image360 No Data Lombard, IL 1/22/26 No Data Acquisition Wide format & sign printing Link
Impact XM
(Port co The Riverside Company)
No Data Dayton, NJ Jack Morton No Data Boston, MA 1/21/26 No Data Merger Experiential & brand graphics Link
Southeastern $45.0 Hialeah, FL Sunbelt Graphics/Dimensional No Data St. Davie, FL 1/19/26 No Data Acquisition Commercial printing Link
Minuteman Press, Buffalo No Data Buffalo, NY XOAR Communications No Data Orchard Park, NY 1/16/26 No Data Acquisition Printing & copying Link
ARC No Data San Ramon, CA Color Reflections No Data Houston, TX 1/15/26 No Data Acquisition Wide-format printing Link
Butterfly Equity No Data Beverly Hills, CA ePac Flexible Packaging No Data Austin, TX 1/15/26 No Data Acquisition Flexible packaging Link
Forum Communications No Data Fargo, ND Sidney Herald (+5 Titles)
(Prop. Wicks Communications)
No Data Sidney, MT 1/14/26 No Data Acquisition
(Dirks, Van Essen)
Community newspapers Link
CJK Group No Data Brainerd, MN WLX & Western Logistics Express No Data Kansas City, MO 1/12/26 No Data Acquisition Logistics Link
PPC Flex
(Port co GTCR)
No Data Buffalo Grove, IL SÜDPACK Operations (US) No Data Oak Creek, WI 1/12/26 No Data Acquisition
(TKO Miller)
Flexible packaging Link
LBU No Data Paterson, NJ Donray Printing No Data Parsippany, NJ 1/9/26 No Data Acquisition Offset dye sublimation printing Link
Crisp Imaging No Data Costa Mesa, CA Piedmont Directional Signs No Data Woodinville, WA 1/8/26 No Data Acquisition Wide format & sign printing Link
Crisp Imaging No Data Costa Mesa, CA A&I Reprographics No Data Ontario, CA 1/7/26 No Data Acquisition Reprographics & wide format Link
Keypoint Intelligence
(Port co. Atar Capital)
No Data Fairfield, NJ DataMaster Online No Data Rennes, France 1/7/26 No Data Acquisition Printer testing service Link
SupplyOne
(Port co. Revelar Capital)
No Data Newtown Square, PA Wertheimer Box No Data McCook, IL 1/6/26 No Data Acquisition Corrugated boxes & displays Link
Sky-High Marketing No Data Waukesha, WI Maple Avenue Printing & Embroidery No Data Big Bend, WI 1/6/26 No Data Acquisition Screen printing Link
United Business Mail No Data Minneapolis, MN Mystic Logistics
(Port co. Main Street Capital)
No Data Glastonbury, CT 1/6/26 No Data Acquisition Marketing Mail Logistics Link
  Bolger No Data Minneapolis, MN American Financial Printing No Data Minneapolis, MN 1/2/26 No Data Acquisition Transactional printing Link


2026 January - Bankruptcy Filings in the Printing, Packaging, Paper & Related Industries



Filing Party

Date
Case
Filed
Pre-Petition
Revenue
(US$Mil)



Case #



Filing Party Address



Circuit



Region & City



Judge



Attorney for Debtor



Notes
Chapter 11 Filings:
Sun Color Corporation 1/30/26 26-60112 North Canton, OH 6th Northern OH
Youngstown
Tiiara N.A. Patton Steven Heimberger Printing inks
  Multi-Color Corporation
(Port co. Clayton, Dubilier & Rice)
1/29/26   26-10910 Atlanta, GA 3rd New Jersey
Trenton
Michael B. Kaplan Michael D. Sirota Label printing & converting
  Chapter 7 Filings:                  
  No Chapter 7 Filings Found this Month --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

   
2026 January - Non-Bankruptcy Closures in the Printing, Packaging, Paper & Related Industries



Closed Company / Facility

Date of Closure
Pre-Closure
Revenue
(US$Mil)



Closing Address
Related Party Related Party
Address
Date Closure Public


Notes

Press
Links
Washington Post - Printing plant Jan-27 No Data North Springfield, VA The Washington Post Washington, D.C. 1/29/26 Newspaper printing plant Link
The Beach Company Jan-26 No Data Coshocton, OH None N/A Jan-26 Printed custom calendars Link
Hersteller May Printing & Embroidery 2/12/26 No Data Graham, TX None N/A Jan-26 Wide format printing & embroidery Link
  The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
(Prop. Block Communications)
May-26 No Data  Pittsburgh, PA Block Communications Toledo, OH 1/7/26 Newspaper ceasing publication Link

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Industry Transformation – December 2025 M&A Activity


Transformation versus Convergence

For much of the past decade, transformation has been framed as a destination: printers becoming packagers, converters becoming platforms, legacy printing businesses adding promotional products and other services to become one-stop shops. December 2025 suggested something more sobering and more demanding, as illustrated by two very different reciprocal strategic moves. Transformation, as illustrated by two transactions announced during the month, has become a continuous process, one that requires companies not only to enter new markets but to know when to turn sideways or exit them as well.

ProAmpac, the PE-backed, financially engineered consolidation vehicle focused initially solely on flexible packaging manufacturers, announced the acquisition of TC Transcontinental Packaging. This transaction does not merely shift ownership of assets; it marks a major inflection point not only in the corporate strategic arc of ProAmpac but also in that of the acquired division’s corporate parent, TC Transcontinental.

ProAmpac: From Aggregation to Leadership

ProAmpac’s origins are familiar to anyone who has followed private equity in packaging over the last fifteen years. ProAmpac was engineered from inception to be acquisitive. Its earliest iteration was not simply as a company, but a strategy, a disciplined roll-up, assembling a portfolio of flexible packaging converters with complementary footprints and customer bases. In its early years, the approach was straightforward: consolidate the fragmented, but growing, flexible packaging business.

What distinguished ProAmpac over time was its refusal to remain in that lane. In 2016, Wellspring Capital, the company’s initial PE sponsor, handed off the ProAmpac platform to Chicago-based Pritzker Private Capital (PPC), which reset the capital base and enabled the next decade of oftentimes frenzied acquisition activity.

One of those acquisitions was the purchase of the Rosenbloom Group, a Canadian company that manufactures bags, including plain brown bags, printed and branded grocery bags, bread bags, grease-resistant bags for French fries and donuts, fast-food takeout bags, and wine bottle bags. Millions and millions of paper-based bags - unpretentious, simple bags. This was a notable departure from the company’s positioning as a leading-edge producer of flexible packaging and pouches. This was the moment ProAmpac shifted from seeking market density to optimizing for market breadth. With this transaction, ProAmpac began diversifying and expanding its product offerings, marking the start of a strategy to acquire companies with a broader range of packaging products to serve its current and new markets (see The Target Report: Bags, Pouches, Trays & Bowls – December 2020).

The dealmakers at ProAmpac completed no less than ten acquisitions in 2021. In addition to expanding its product line to include paper bags, ProAmpac expanded vertically into its supply chain with the acquisition of APC Paper Group in Claremont, New Hampshire. The acquired company manufactures 100% recycled kraft-grade paper products, a key component in the previously acquired bag manufacturing companies.

Paper was not the only vertical integration move. Earlier that year, ProAmpac completed two other acquisitions that also moved the company vertically within its supply chain, purchasing IG Industries and Brayford Plastics, both UK-based manufacturers of plastic films used in bag and flexible packaging production. This vertical integration represented a fairly dramatic departure from the basic roll-up strategy. (See The Target Report: Packaging Industry Consolidation in Every Direction – July 2021.)

Additional acquisitions continued subsequent to the 2021 watershed period, further diversifying the company geographically, expanding the markets served, and introducing new product types. No longer simply a roll-up of flexible packaging companies based on plastic substrates, ProAmpac had transitioned to include a multitude of fiber-based packaging companies, including the acquisition of three kraft-paper mills. This shift to paper products was further enhanced and publicized with the early 2025 rollout of the company’s branding initiative, “Fiberization of Packaging.”

In August 2025, ProAmpac acquired PAC Worldwide. Headquartered in Redmond, Washington, the acquired company specializes in protective mailers and specialty packaging for e‑commerce, courier, and retail applications. Despite the rather plain brown-paper nature of many of PAC’s mailers, the acquisition was framed positively within the broader strategic shift away from ProAmpac’s earlier positioning as a roll-up of flexible packaging companies. According to Greg Tucker, Founder, Vice Chairman, and CEO of ProAmpac, in the press release about the deal, “This is a transformational moment for our companies; we are creating unmatched packaging capabilities.” Another move to increase its fiber-based packaging capacity came in October 2025, when ProAmpac announced it had purchased International Paper's bag-converting operations.

In the waning days of 2025, ProAmpac announced the blockbuster acquisition of the TC Transcontinental Packaging division (“TCP”) from its Canadian parent company, TC Transcontinental. ProAmpac is paying approximately US $1.51 billion for TCP, representing a multiple of approximately 9 times EBITDA, calculated exclusive of operating leases. The TCP acquisition adds advanced capabilities in the dairy, meat, medical, and pharmaceutical end markets, as well as manufacturing sites in North America, Latin America, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand.

As the flexible packaging sector has matured and simple multiple arbitrage (i.e., a larger company commands higher enterprise purchase multiples) has become harder to achieve, ProAmpac has begun shifting its acquisition strategy toward technology and capabilities. Barrier films, sustainable materials (fiber-based), advanced laminations, and specialized end-market solutions increasingly defined the deal rationale. The acquisition of TC Transcontinental Packaging represents the culmination of that evolution. This was not a tuck-in, nor a technology add-on. It was the absorption of a scaled, global packaging platform carved out of a diversified public company. For ProAmpac, this was, as stated in the press release, “a transformative milestone for both companies.”

TC Transcontinental: Reinvention, Repeated

If ProAmpac’s story is one of gradual evolution, TC Transcontinental’s is one of deliberate reinvention — not once, but multiple times.

For much of its history, TC Transcontinental (“TC”) was synonymous with newspaper and publication printing. At its peak, it was one of North America’s largest printers of newspapers, magazines, and retail flyers, benefiting from scale in a market that rewarded volume, logistics expertise, and long-term contracts. When that market began its secular decline, many peers hesitated, hoping the erosion would slow or reverse. TC Transcontinental did not wait.

In a decision we examined extensively in earlier Target Reports after it was first announced, TC Transcontinental chose to pivot away from its legacy identity. Given the headwinds facing the newspaper and magazine segments, company management made the strategic decision to change course. Packaging, particularly flexible packaging, was identified as a growth engine capable of offsetting the structural decline in print.

At the outset of this strategy in March 2014, when TC acquired its first flexible packaging company, François Olivier, TC's President and CEO at the time, stated that the deal was the first indication of the company’s new strategic plan to grow through diversification. He added that flexible packaging was a natural fit, given that the production process was similar to their current operations, which run roll-fed substrates, and the market offered growth opportunities.

By November 2017, the company had announced its fifth deal in the flexible packaging segment. Lest there be any lack of clarity as to the company’s strategic direction, Isabell Marcoux, Chair of the Board of TC, reiterated in the 2016 annual report that TC’s vision includes “transforming the organization to be a North American leader in flexible packaging.”

In our opinion, expressed at the time, the transformation of TC was possibly the best example of a planned, disciplined, articulate and well-executed strategy that utilized a company’s existing financial strength gained from its traditional foundation, in this case printing newspapers and magazines, to build out an entirely new expertise in a much more desirable (and likely sustainable over the long term) segment of the printing industry. (See The Target Report: Flexible Packaging is Hot – November 2017.)

By 2018, a visitor to TC Transcontinental’s website was greeted with the opening line, “TC Transcontinental is a leader in flexible packaging in North America …” That was a bold statement from a company that had managed to transform itself in just four years from primarily a publication and commercial printer, with no packaging experience, to become a powerhouse in the flexible packaging segment. Upon the acquisition of Coveris Americas, a billion-dollar flexible packaging printing company, the company reported that on a going-forward basis, packaging would represent 48% of the company’s revenue, more than any of the company’s traditional service segments, such as retail-related services (27%), Newspapers (7%), or magazines and books (7%). (See The Target Report: Getting Flexible in Your Middle Years - April 2018.)

When first announced, TC Transcontinental’s move into packaging was a bold bet, trading the certainty of a declining legacy business for the uncertainty of a highly competitive growth market in which valuations were soaring. In hindsight, it was prescient. Packaging did not merely replace lost print revenue; it reshaped the company’s narrative and stabilized its future. TC Transcontinental’s move remains a model for how a legacy graphic communications company can successfully reinvent itself.

From an M&A perspective, the company has remained laser-focused on implementing this strategy. Capital was redeployed. Acquisitions were made. Capabilities were built. Over time, TC Transcontinental Packaging became a credible, scaled player in its own right within the flexible packaging segment. That is, up to now.

December 2025 marks the second act in this story and, at first glance, perhaps the more challenging to understand. Having built a meaningful packaging business, TC Transcontinental chose to sell it. To casual observers, this might appear to be a retreat. In reality, it likely reflects a deeper strategic discipline: management believes the flexible packaging market is mature, the division has reached peak valuation, and there is little marginal benefit from additional scale.

The sale of TC Transcontinental Packaging to ProAmpac is not an abandonment of transformation, but its continuation. Having proven it could enter, scale, and professionalize a packaging platform, the company is now choosing to exit at a moment of strength, as evidenced by the multiple achieved. The majority of the capital unlocked by the sale of TCP is being distributed to the shareholders, with the balance retained and redirected toward retail services and educational publishing — areas where TC now believes its operational DNA, customer relationships, and risk tolerance are better aligned for the long term.

This is not diversification for its own sake. It is portfolio management at the corporate level, informed by a sober assessment of where durable value can be created. Isabell Marcoux, now Executive Chair of the Board, stated, “As we approach our 50th anniversary, TC Transcontinental is once again reinventing itself. We are excited to open a new chapter in our history, with a sharp focus on advancing the transformation of our Retail Services & Printing and Educational Publishing businesses.”

Transformation as a Continuous Process

What ties these two stories together is not packaging, nor private equity, nor even deal size. It is the recognition that transformation is no longer a one-time event. In earlier eras, companies reinvented themselves maybe every few generations, often under duress. Today, the pace of technological change, customer behavior, and capital market expectations demands a different approach. Companies that do not continually reassess their strategic transformation may find themselves in a systemic downward spiral, too late to make the necessary changes.

ProAmpac and TC Transcontinental, in very different ways, avoided that trap. ProAmpac did not stop evolving once it achieved scale; it adjusted its acquisition strategy as the market matured. TC Transcontinental did not cling to packaging simply because it had worked; it recognized when the risk-reward equation had shifted and acted accordingly.

What This Means for Owners and Executives

The December 2025 lesson may be uncomfortable for some, but it is clear to industry leaders. The question is no longer whether transformation is necessary, but whether leadership teams are prepared to undertake it repeatedly. The industry is littered with companies that successfully navigated one transition, from offset to digital, from print to packaging, from production to services, only to stall when the next inflection point arrived.

Together, these two interlocking stories illustrate how survival in the printing, packaging, and graphic communications industries increasingly depends not on scale alone, but on a willingness to repeatedly redefine strategic corporate direction, sometimes in what appears to be a radical change of mission. Transformation is no longer a chapter in the story. It is the story.
   
2025 December - Mergers and Acquisitions in the Printing, Packaging, Paper & Related Industries

Deal Party #1
(Surviving Entity)
Pre-Deal
Revenue
(US$Mil)


Party #1 Address


Deal Party #2
Pre-Deal
Revenue
(US$Mil)


Party #2 Address
Date
Deal
Public
Deal
Value
(US$Mil)

Deal Structure
(Intermediary)


Notes

Press
Links
Stockton Sentinel No Data Stockton, KS The Plainville Times
(Prop. Main Street Media)
No Data Plainsville, KS 12/26/25 No Data Acquisition
(Dirks, Van Essen)
Community newspaper Link
JohnsByrne
(Port co. GHK Capital Partners)
No Data Niles, IL Municipal Packaging No Data Chatsworth, CA 12/22/25 No Data Acquisition Folding cartons & retail displays Link
Minuteman Press, Lansing
(New franchisee)
No Data Lansing, MI Minuteman Press, Lansing No Data Lansing, MI 12/19/25 No Data Acquisition Printing & copying Link
The Vomela Companies
(Port co. The Riverside Company)
$377.0 St. Paul, MN Moss
(Port co. EagleTree Capital)
$110.0 Franklin Park, IL 12/16/25 No Data Acquisition Wide & grand format printing Link
Mimeo No Data Memphis, TN KnowledgePoint Print Services
(Div. KnowledgePoint)
No Data Reading,
England
12/10/25 No Data Acquisition Print & fulfillment services Link
Tara TPS No Data Seoul, South Korea Chicago Offset No Data Elk Grove Village 12/10/25 No Data Acquisition Commercial printing Link
ProAmpac
(Port co. Pritzker Partners)
No Data Cincinnati, OH TC Transcontinental Packaging
(Div. TC Transcontinental)
$1,200 Chicago, IL
(Montreal, QC)
12/8/25 $1,510 Acquisition Flexible packaging Link
Sticker Mule No Data Amsterdam, NY Rockin Monkey No Data San Antonio, TX 12/8/25 No Data Acquisition Label printing Link
Sappi/UPM Joint Venture No Data TBD Graphic Papers Assets
(Div. UPM-Kymmene)
No Data Helinski, Finland 12/5/25 $373 Joint Venture 4 Graphic paper mills
(Finland, Germany, Austria & NL)
Link
Sappi/UPM Joint Venture No Data TBD Graphic Papers Assets
(Div. Sappi Limited)
No Data Johannesburg,
South Africa
12/5/25 $1,281 Joint Venture 8 Graphic paper mills
(Finland, UK, Germany, & US)
Link
  Inovar Packaging Group
(Port co. Kelso & Company)
No Data Dallas, TX Enterprise Marking Products No Data Fishers, IN 12/1/25 No Data Acquisition Label printing Link
 
 
 
2025 December - Bankruptcy Filings in the Printing, Packaging, Paper & Related Industries



Filing Party

Date
Case
Filed
Pre-Petition
Revenue
(US$Mil)



Case #



Filing Party Address



Circuit



Region & City



Judge



Attorney for Debtor



Notes
Chapter 11 Filings:
Bottomline Ink, Corporation
dba Blink Marketing Logistics
12/31/25 No Data 25-32806 Perrysburg, OH 6th Northern OH
Toledo
Mary Ann Whipple Steven L. Diller Print management
  Sticky Wall Vinyl LLC 12/21/25 No Data 25-08281 Orlando, FL 11th Middle FL
Orlando
Lori V. Vaughan L. Todd Budgen Wide-format & décor
  Chapter 7 Filings:                  
Diamond Comic Distributors, Inc. 12/22/25 No Data 25-10308 Hunt Valley, MD 4th Maryland
Baltimore
David E. Rice TBD Converted to Ch. 7 & from Ch 11
  Tricor Print Communications, Inc.
dba Tricor Brand Communications
12/19/25 No Data 25-34231 Tigard, OR 9th Oregon
Portland
Peter C. McKittrick Timothy A. Solomon Marketing & commercial printing

   
2025 December - Non-Bankruptcy Closures in the Printing, Packaging, Paper & Related Industries



Closed Company / Facility

Date of Closure
Pre-Closure
Revenue
(US$Mil)



Closing Address
Related Party Related Party
Address
Date Closure Public


Notes

Press
Links
Pittsburgh City Paper Dec-25 No Data Pittsburgh, PA Block Communications Toledo, OH 12/31/25 Community newspaper Link
Smyth - Label & flexible packaging plant
(Port co. Crestview Partners)
Jun-25 No Data Wilmington, MA Symth Companies Eagan, MN 12/23/25 Labels & flexible packaging Link
Quad - Printing plant Mar-25 No Data The Rock, GA Quad Sussex, WI 12/22/25 Long-run publication printing Link
McClain Printing Company 1/22/26 No Data Parsons, WV None N/A Dec-25 Commercial printing Link
  Domtar - Crofton Mill 12/15/25 No Data Crofton, BC Domtar Fort Mill, SC 12/3/25 Pulp mill, previously produced newsprint Link